The study we carried out enabled us to extract some conclusions, which are contrasted with the results obtained. First, in the field of mobile applications, permissions and tracers are almost always present. Android, as far as PlayStore permissions are concerned, is the main entity concerning this domain. Under the pretext of guaranteeing an optimal functioning of the applications, these permissions can sometimes hide some very dangerous tracing means for the users. Google, a major player in tracing and a major power in the storage of information of net users, is behind most tracers. Trackers have two main missions. On the one hand, they allow the application to work, like Facebook's trackers that are used to log into the application or Google's trackers that allow either to trace crashes or to analyze how the application is used. On the other hand, they allow you to manage the advertising that appears in the application, which can be targeted or not. Regarding tracking in emails, we find stakeholders quite present: Google, Xiti and Iroquois. Even if they are most often used in the context of hearing measurements, they are present in public service emails. Finally with websites, Google is very present in government websites. We find common actors for applications and emails such as GAFAM or Xiti. Most of the cookies present are for audience measurement and advertising display which is often targeted.
翻译:我们进行的研究使我们得以得出一些结论,这些结论与所获得的结果形成对比。首先,在移动应用程序领域,许可和追踪器几乎总是存在。就PlayStore许可而言,机器人是该领域的主要实体。在保证应用程序最佳运作的前提下,这些许可有时可以隐藏用户使用的一些非常危险的追踪手段。谷歌是追踪网络用户信息的主要参与者和存储网络用户信息的主要力量,在大多数跟踪者后面。跟踪者有两个主要任务。一方面,它们允许应用程序工作,例如用于登录应用程序或谷歌跟踪器的追踪器,以便跟踪碰撞或分析应用程序的使用情况。另一方面,它们允许你管理应用程序中出现的一些非常危险的追踪手段。关于电子邮件的跟踪,我们发现利益攸关方非常有:谷歌、西提和伊罗科伊斯。即使它们经常用于听力测量,它们也出现在公共服务电子邮件中,它们也出现在用于登录应用程序或谷歌追踪器跟踪器,最后,谷歌网站是GAM的普通网站和GAF,这些网站是GAF的普通网站。