NLP-assisted solutions have gained considerable traction to support qualitative data analysis. However, there does not exist a unified evaluation framework that can account for the many different settings in which qualitative researchers may employ them. In this paper, we take a first step in this direction by proposing an evaluation framework to study the way in which different tools may result in different outcomes depending on the collaboration strategy employed. Specifically, we study the impact of synchronous vs. asynchronous collaboration using two different NLP-assisted qualitative research tools and present a comprehensive analysis of significant differences in the consistency, cohesiveness, and correctness of their outputs.
翻译:自然语言处理辅助解决方案在支持定性数据分析方面已获得显著关注。然而,目前尚不存在一个统一的评估框架,能够涵盖定性研究人员可能采用这些工具的多种不同场景。本文通过提出一个评估框架来研究不同工具如何根据所采用的协作策略产生不同结果,朝着这个方向迈出了第一步。具体而言,我们使用两种不同的自然语言处理辅助定性研究工具,研究了同步协作与异步协作的影响,并对输出结果在一致性、凝聚性和正确性方面的显著差异进行了全面分析。