The site-specific management of weeds in grassland is often challenging because different weed control strategies have different trade-offs regarding the required resources and treatment efficiency. So, the question arises whether a wide tractor-based system with section control or a small agricultural robot has a higher weed control performance for a given infestation scenario. For example, a small autonomous robot moving from one weed to the next might have much shorter travel distances (and thus lower energy and time costs) than a tractor-mounted system if the locations of the weeds are relatively isolated across the field. However, if the plants are highly concentrated in small areas so-called clusters, the increased width of the tractor-mounted implement could be beneficial because of shorter travel distances and greater working width. An additional challenge is the fact that there is no complete knowledge of the weed locations. Weeds may not have been detected, for example, due to their growth stage, occlusion by other objects, or misclassification. Weed control strategies must therefore also be evaluated with regard to this issue. Thus, in addition to the driving distance, other metrics are also of interest, such as the number of plants that were actually controlled or the size of the total treatment area. We performed this investigation for the treatment of the toxic Colchicum autumnale, which had been detected in drone images of extensive grassland sites. In addition to real data, we generated and analyzed simulated weed locations using mathematical models of stochastic geometry. These offer the possibility to simulate very different spatial distributions of toxic plant locations. Different treatment strategies were then virtually tested on this data using Monte Carlo simulations and their performance was statistically evaluated.
翻译:草原杂草的具体地点管理往往具有挑战性,因为不同的杂草控制战略在所需资源和治疗效率方面有着不同的权衡取舍。因此,问题在于一个带有节控的大型拖拉机系统或一个小型农业机器人对特定侵扰情景的杂草控制性能是否更高。例如,一个小型自主机器人从一个杂草移动到下一个杂草地点,其旅行距离(从而降低能量和时间成本)可能比拖拉机上安装的系统要短得多,如果杂草地点在外地相对隔绝,则这种杂草处理的地点也相对不同。然而,如果工厂高度集中在小的所谓陆地组,那么由于旅行距离缩短和工作宽度较大,以拖拉机为主的实测距执行系统可能更宽一些。另一个挑战是,对杂草原地点没有完全了解。例如,由于它们的生长阶段、被其他物体隔绝或分类错误,因此,杂草原控制战略也必须就此问题进行评估。因此,除了驱动距离之外,其他测量距离、其他测量的模拟模拟机床执行的机的宽范围也可能是感兴趣的地点。我们用直径测测测测的轨道数据。我们测测测测测测测测测测了多少的工厂的轨道,因此测测测测测测测测测测测测了这些工厂的轨道的轨道数据。我们测测测测测测测测测了多少的轨道的轨道的轨道。