Backdoor attacks have been a critical threat to deep neural network (DNN). However, most existing countermeasures focus on source-agnostic backdoor attacks (SABAs) and fail to defeat source-specific backdoor attacks (SSBAs). Compared to an SABA, an SSBA activates a backdoor when an input from attacker-chosen class(es) is stamped with an attacker-specified trigger, making itself stealthier and thus evade most existing backdoor mitigation. Nonetheless, existing SSBAs have trade-offs on attack success rate (ASR, a backdoor is activated by a trigger input from a source class as expected) and false positive rate (FPR, a backdoor is activated unexpectedly by a trigger input from a non-source class). Significantly, they can still be effectively detected by the state-of-the-art (SOTA) countermeasures targeting SSBAs. This work overcomes efficiency and effectiveness deficiencies of existing SSBAs, thus bypassing the SOTA defences. The key insight is to construct desired poisoned and cover data during backdoor training by characterising SSBAs in-depth. Both data are samples with triggers: the cover/poisoned data from non-source/source class(es) holds ground-truth/target labels. Therefore, two cover/poisoned data enhancements are developed from trigger style and content, respectively, coined CASSOCK. First, we leverage trigger patterns with discrepant transparency to craft cover/poisoned data, enforcing triggers with heterogeneous sensitivity on different classes. The second enhancement chooses the target class features as triggers to craft these samples, entangling trigger features with the target class heavily. Compared with existing SSBAs, CASSOCK-based attacks have higher ASR and low FPR on four popular tasks: MNIST, CIFAR10, GTSRB, and LFW. More importantly, CASSOCK has effectively evaded three defences (SCAn, Februus and extended Neural Cleanse) already defeat existing SSBAs effectively.
翻译:后门攻击是对深层神经网络(DNN)的严重威胁。 然而,大多数现有对策都侧重于源性低效后门攻击(SABAs ), 并且未能击败源性低效后门攻击(SSBAs ) 。 与SABA相比, SSAS在攻击者选择的类投入被攻击者指定触发时启动后门攻击,使自己更隐蔽,从而避免了现有的幕后缓解。 然而,现有的SSBAs在攻击成功率上进行了权衡(ASR,后门通过源类触发器启动后门攻击(SABAs ), 也未能击败特定源性后门攻击(SABAs ) 。 FPRSBS(SBS) 与非源性目标性直径直的直径直击(SBS-FTAs), 直径直径直的直径直径直径直径直的直径直的直径直径直射/直径直径直径直径直径直的直径直径直的直的直径直射, 直径直径直的直径直的直的直的直射, 直的直射, 直距直的直的直的直射偏向右的, 直的, 直的, 直距右的。