This book can be seen either as a text on theorem proving that uses techniques from general algebra, or else as a text on general algebra illustrated and made concrete by practical exercises in theorem proving. The book considers several different logical systems, including first-order logic, Horn clause logic, equational logic, and first-order logic with equality. Similarly, several different proof paradigms are considered. However, we do emphasize equational logic, and for simplicity we use only the OBJ3 software system, though it is used in a rather flexible manner. We do not pursue the lofty goal of mechanizing proofs like those of which mathematicians are justly so proud; instead, we seek to take steps towards providing mechanical assistance for proofs that are useful for computer scientists in developing software and hardware. This more modest goal has the advantage of both being achievable and having practical benefits. The following topics are covered: many-sorted signature, algebra and homomorphism; term algebra and substitution; equation and satisfaction; conditional equations; equational deduction and its completeness; deduction for conditional equations; the theorem of constants; interpretation and equivalence of theories; term rewriting, termination, confluence and normal form; abstract rewrite systems; standard models, abstract data types, initiality, and induction; rewriting and deduction modulo equations; first-order logic, models, and proof planning; second-order algebra; order-sorted algebra and rewriting; modules; unification and completion; and hidden algebra. In parallel with these are a gradual introduction to OBJ3, applications to group theory, various abstract data types (such as number systems, lists, and stacks), propositional calculus, hardware verification, the {\lambda}-calculus, correctness of functional programs, and other topics.

### 相关内容

ACM/IEEE第23届模型驱动工程语言和系统国际会议，是模型驱动软件和系统工程的首要会议系列，由ACM-SIGSOFT和IEEE-TCSE支持组织。自1998年以来，模型涵盖了建模的各个方面，从语言和方法到工具和应用程序。模特的参加者来自不同的背景，包括研究人员、学者、工程师和工业专业人士。MODELS 2019是一个论坛，参与者可以围绕建模和模型驱动的软件和系统交流前沿研究成果和创新实践经验。今年的版本将为建模社区提供进一步推进建模基础的机会，并在网络物理系统、嵌入式系统、社会技术系统、云计算、大数据、机器学习、安全、开源等新兴领域提出建模的创新应用以及可持续性。 官网链接：http://www.modelsconference.org/

Automated testing tools typically create test cases that are different from what human testers create. This often makes the tools less effective, the created tests harder to understand, and thus results in tools providing less support to human testers. Here, we propose a framework based on cognitive science and, in particular, an analysis of approaches to problem-solving, for identifying cognitive processes of testers. The framework helps map test design steps and criteria used in human test activities and thus to better understand how effective human testers perform their tasks. Ultimately, our goal is to be able to mimic how humans create test cases and thus to design more human-like automated test generation systems. We posit that such systems can better augment and support testers in a way that is meaningful to them.

In the consensus halving problem we are given n agents with valuations over the interval $[0,1]$. The goal is to divide the interval into at most $n+1$ pieces (by placing at most n cuts), which may be combined to give a partition of $[0,1]$ into two sets valued equally by all agents. The existence of a solution may be established by the Borsuk-Ulam theorem. We consider the task of computing an approximation of an exact solution of the consensus halving problem, where the valuations are given by distribution functions computed by algebraic circuits. Here approximation refers to computing a point that $\varepsilon$-close to an exact solution, also called strong approximation. We show that this task is polynomial time equivalent to computing an approximation to an exact solution of the Borsuk-Ulam search problem defined by a continuous function that is computed by an algebraic circuit. The Borsuk-Ulam search problem is the defining problem of the complexity class BU. We introduce a new complexity class BBU to also capture an alternative formulation of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem from a computational point of view. We investigate their relationship and prove several structural results for these classes as well as for the complexity class FIXP.

We propose GraphMineSuite (GMS): the first benchmarking suite for graph mining that facilitates evaluating and constructing high-performance graph mining algorithms. First, GMS comes with a benchmark specification based on extensive literature review, prescribing representative problems, algorithms, and datasets. Second, GMS offers a carefully designed software platform for seamless testing of different fine-grained elements of graph mining algorithms, such as graph representations or algorithm subroutines. The platform includes parallel implementations of more than 40 considered baselines, and it facilitates developing complex and fast mining algorithms. High modularity is possible by harnessing set algebra operations such as set intersection and difference, which enables breaking complex graph mining algorithms into simple building blocks that can be separately experimented with. GMS is supported with a broad concurrency analysis for portability in performance insights, and a novel performance metric to assess the throughput of graph mining algorithms, enabling more insightful evaluation. As use cases, we harness GMS to rapidly redesign and accelerate state-of-the-art baselines of core graph mining problems: degeneracy reordering (by up to >2x), maximal clique listing (by up to >9x), k-clique listing (by 1.1x), and subgraph isomorphism (by up to 2.5x), also obtaining better theoretical performance bounds.

Provably correct software is one of the key challenges in our softwaredriven society. While formal verification establishes the correctness of a given program, the result of program synthesis is a program which is correct by construction. In this paper we overview some of our results for both of these scenarios when analysing programs with loops. The class of loops we consider can be modelled by a system of linear recurrence equations with constant coefficients, called C-finite recurrences. We first describe an algorithmic approach for synthesising all polynomial equality invariants of such non-deterministic numeric single-path loops. By reverse engineering invariant synthesis, we then describe an automated method for synthesising program loops satisfying a given set of polynomial loop invariants. Our results have applications towards proving partial correctness of programs, compiler optimisation and generating number sequences from algebraic relations. This is a preprint that was invited for publication at VMCAI 2021.

A growing number of machine learning architectures, such as Generative Adversarial Networks, rely on the design of games which implement a desired functionality via a Nash equilibrium. In practice these games have an implicit complexity (e.g. from underlying datasets and the deep networks used) that makes directly computing a Nash equilibrium impractical or impossible. For this reason, numerous learning algorithms have been developed with the goal of iteratively converging to a Nash equilibrium. Unfortunately, the dynamics generated by the learning process can be very intricate and instances of training failure hard to interpret. In this paper we show that, in a strong sense, this dynamic complexity is inherent to games. Specifically, we prove that replicator dynamics, the continuous-time analogue of Multiplicative Weights Update, even when applied in a very restricted class of games -- known as finite matrix games -- is rich enough to be able to approximate arbitrary dynamical systems. Our results are positive in the sense that they show the nearly boundless dynamic modelling capabilities of current machine learning practices, but also negative in implying that these capabilities may come at the cost of interpretability. As a concrete example, we show how replicator dynamics can effectively reproduce the well-known strange attractor of Lonrenz dynamics (the "butterfly effect") while achieving no regret.

The logic of Bunched Implications (BI) combines both additive and multiplicative connectives, which include two primitive intuitionistic implications. As a consequence, contexts in the sequent presentation are not lists, nor multisets, but rather tree-like structures called bunches. This additional complexity notwithstanding, the logic has a well-behaved metatheory admitting all the familiar forms of semantics and proof systems. However, the presentation of an effective proof-search procedure has been elusive since the logic's debut. We show that one can reduce the proof-search space for any given sequent to a primitive recursive set, the argument generalizing Gentzen's decidability argument for classical propositional logic and combining key features of Dyckhoff's contraction-elimination argument for intuitionistic logic. An effective proof-search procedure, and hence decidability of provability, follows as a corollary.

It is known that each word of length $n$ contains at most $n+1$ distinct palindromes. A finite rich word is a word with maximal number of palindromic factors. The definition of palindromic richness can be naturally extended to infinite words. Sturmian words and Rote complementary symmetric sequences form two classes of binary rich words, while episturmian words and words coding symmetric $d$-interval exchange transformations give us other examples on larger alphabets. In this paper we look for morphisms of the free monoid, which allow to construct new rich words from already known rich words. We focus on morphisms in Class $P_{ret}$. This class contains morphisms injective on the alphabet and satisfying a particular palindromicity property: for every morphism $\varphi$ in the class there exists a palindrome $w$ such that $\varphi(a)w$ is a first complete return word to $w$ for each letter $a$. We characterize $P_{ret}$ morphisms which preserve richness over a binary alphabet. We also study marked $P_{ret}$ morphisms acting on alphabets with more letters. In particular we show that every Arnoux-Rauzy morphism is conjugated to a morphism in Class $P_{ret}$ and that it preserves richness.

The growing adoption of smart contracts on blockchains poses new security risks that can lead to significant monetary loss, while existing approaches either provide no (or partial) security guarantees for smart contracts or require huge proof effort. To address this challenge, we present SciviK, a versatile framework for specifying and verifying industrial-grade smart contracts. SciviK's versatile approach extends previous efforts with three key contributions: (i) an expressive annotation system enabling built-in directives for vulnerability pattern checking, neural-based loop invariant inference, and the verification of rich properties of real-world smart contracts (ii) a fine-grained model for the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) that provides low-level execution semantics, (iii) an IR-level verification framework integrating both SMT solvers and the Coq proof assistant. We use SciviK to specify and verify security properties for 12 benchmark contracts and a real-world Decentralized Finance (DeFi) smart contract. Among all 158 specified security properties (in six types), 151 properties can be automatically verified within 2 seconds, five properties can be automatically verified after moderate modifications, and two properties are manually proved with around 200 lines of Coq code.

Refinement type checkers are a powerful way to reason about functional programs. For example, one can prove properties of a slow, specification implementation, porting the proofs to an optimized implementation that behaves the same. Without functional extensionality, proofs must relate functions that are fully applied. When data itself has a higher-order representation, fully applied proofs face serious impediments! When working with first-order data, fully applied proofs lead to noisome duplication when using higher-order functions. While dependent type theories are typically consistent with functional extensionality axioms, refinement type systems with semantic subtyping treat naive phrasings of functional extensionality inconsistently, leading to unsoundness. We demonstrate this unsoundness and develop a new approach to equality in Liquid Haskell: we define a propositional equality in a library we call PEq. Using PEq avoids the unsoundness while still proving useful equalities at higher types; we demonstrate its use in several case studies. We validate PEq by building a small model and developing its metatheory. Additionally, we prove metaproperties of PEq inside Liquid Haskell itself using an unnamed folklore technique, which we dub `classy induction'.

UMAP (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection) is a novel manifold learning technique for dimension reduction. UMAP is constructed from a theoretical framework based in Riemannian geometry and algebraic topology. The result is a practical scalable algorithm that applies to real world data. The UMAP algorithm is competitive with t-SNE for visualization quality, and arguably preserves more of the global structure with superior run time performance. Furthermore, UMAP has no computational restrictions on embedding dimension, making it viable as a general purpose dimension reduction technique for machine learning.

Eleni Batziou,Kristoffer Arnsfelt Hansen,Kasper Høgh
0+阅读 · 3月7日
Maciej Besta,Zur Vonarburg-Shmaria,Yannick Schaffner,Leonardo Schwarz,Grzegorz Kwasniewski,Lukas Gianinazzi,Jakub Beranek,Kacper Janda,Tobias Holenstein,Sebastian Leisinger,Peter Tatkowski,Esref Ozdemir,Adrian Balla,Marcin Copik,Philipp Lindenberger,Pavel Kalvoda,Marek Konieczny,Onur Mutlu,Torsten Hoefler
0+阅读 · 3月5日
Andreas Humenberger,Laura Kovacs
0+阅读 · 3月5日
0+阅读 · 3月5日
Alexander Gheorghiu,Simon Docherty,David Pym
0+阅读 · 3月3日
Francesco Dolce,Edita Pelantová
0+阅读 · 3月3日
Shaokai Lin,Xinyuan Sun,Jianan Yao,Ronghui Gu
0+阅读 · 3月3日
Niki Vazou,Michael Greenberg
0+阅读 · 3月3日
Leland McInnes,John Healy,James Melville
7+阅读 · 2018年12月6日

40+阅读 · 2020年11月20日

43+阅读 · 2019年10月12日

28+阅读 · 2019年10月10日

37+阅读 · 2019年10月9日

12+阅读 · 2020年1月4日
Call4Papers
7+阅读 · 2019年6月24日
CreateAMind
26+阅读 · 2019年1月3日

10+阅读 · 2018年12月24日

3+阅读 · 2018年6月12日
CreateAMind
3+阅读 · 2018年4月15日

6+阅读 · 2017年11月25日

5+阅读 · 2017年8月23日

5+阅读 · 2017年8月17日

3+阅读 · 2017年8月6日
Top