Model averaging techniques in the actuarial literature aim to forecast future longevity appropriately by combining forecasts derived from various models. This approach often yields more accurate predictions than those generated by a single model. The key to enhancing forecast accuracy through model averaging lies in identifying the optimal weights from a finite sample. Utilizing sub-optimal weights in computations may adversely impact the accuracy of the model-averaged longevity forecasts. By proposing a game-theoretic approach employing Shapley values for weight selection, our study clarifies the distinct impact of each model on the collective predictive outcome. This analysis not only delineates the importance of each model in decision-making processes, but also provides insight into their contribution to the overall predictive performance of the ensemble.
翻译:精算文献中的模型平均技术旨在通过整合来自不同模型的预测结果,对未来寿命进行适当预测。这种方法通常比单一模型产生的预测更为准确。通过模型平均提升预测精度的关键在于从有限样本中确定最优权重。在计算中使用次优权重可能会对模型平均寿命预测的准确性产生不利影响。本研究提出了一种采用Shapley值进行权重选择的博弈论方法,阐明了每个模型对集体预测结果的不同影响。该分析不仅明确了各模型在决策过程中的重要性,还深入揭示了它们对集成模型整体预测性能的贡献。