Twitter, prompted by the rapid spread of alternative narratives, started actively warning users about the spread of COVID-19 misinformation. This form of soft moderation comes in two forms: as a warning cover before the Tweet is displayed to the user and as a warning tag below the Tweet. This study investigates how each of the soft moderation forms affects the perceived accuracy of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on Twitter. The results suggest that the warning covers work, but not the tags, in reducing the perception of accuracy of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on Twitter. "Belief echoes" do exist among Twitter users, unfettered by any warning labels, in relationship to the perceived safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine as well as the vaccination hesitancy for themselves and their children. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of usable security affordances for combating misinformation on social media.
翻译:这种软性节制形式以两种形式出现:向用户展示Tweet之前的警告封面,并在Tweet下方作为警告标记。这项研究调查了每种软性节制形式如何影响Twitter上COVID-19疫苗误传的准确性。研究结果表明,警告覆盖了工作,而不是标签,降低了Twitter上COVID-19疫苗误传的准确性。Twitter用户中确实存在“信任回响”,没有任何警告标签的束缚,这与COVID-19疫苗被认为的安全性和有效性以及他们自己及其子女接种疫苗的犹豫不决有关。这些结果的影响在打击社交媒体误传的可用安全保障的背景下讨论。