Search engines are used and trusted by hundreds of millions of people every day. However, the algorithms used by search engines to index, filter, and rank web content are inherently biased, and will necessarily prefer some views and opinions at the expense of others. In this article, we examine how these algorithmic biases amplify and suppress polarizing content. Polarization refers to a shift toward and the acceptance of ideological extremes. In Europe, polarizing content in relation to LGBTIQ+ issues has been a feature of various ideological and political conflicts. Although past research has focused on the role of social media in polarization, the role of search engines in this process is little understood. Here, we report on a large-scale study of 1.5 million search results responding to neutral and negative queries relating to LGBTIQ+ issues. Focusing on the UK, Germany, and France, our analysis shows that the choice of search engine is the key determinant of exposure to polarizing content, followed by the polarity of the query. Location and language, on the other hand, have a comparatively minor effect. Consequently, our findings provide quantitative insights into how differences between search engine technologies, rather than the opinions, language, and location of web users, have the greatest impact on the exposure of web users to polarizing Web content.
翻译:搜索引擎每日被数亿人使用并信赖。然而,搜索引擎用于索引、过滤和排序网络内容的算法本质上是存在偏见的,必然会优先呈现某些观点和意见,同时牺牲其他观点。本文探讨了这些算法偏见如何放大和抑制极化内容。极化指的是向意识形态极端化转变并接受极端观点的过程。在欧洲,与LGBTIQ+议题相关的极化内容已成为多种意识形态和政治冲突的特征。尽管既往研究多关注社交媒体在极化中的作用,但搜索引擎在此过程中的作用尚鲜为人知。本研究基于对150万条涉及LGBTIQ+议题的中性与负面查询搜索结果的大规模分析。聚焦英国、德国和法国三国的数据显示:搜索引擎的选择是接触极化内容的关键决定因素,其次是查询语句的极性。相比之下,地理位置和语言的影响相对较小。因此,我们的发现量化揭示了搜索引擎技术差异(而非网络用户的观点、语言和地理位置)对用户接触网络极化内容具有最大影响。