This paper evaluates Parler, the controversial social media platform, from two seemingly orthogonal perspectives: UX design perspective and data science. UX design researchers explore how users react to the interface/content of their social media feeds; Data science researchers analyze the misinformation flow in these feeds to detect alternative narratives and state-sponsored disinformation campaigns. We took a critical look into the intersection of these approaches to understand how Parler's interface itself is conductive to the flow of misinformation and the perception of "free speech" among its audience. Parler drew widespread attention leading up to and after the 2020 U.S. elections as the "alternative" place for free speech, as a reaction to other mainstream social media platform which actively engaged in labeling misinformation with content warnings. Because platforms like Parler are disruptive to the social media landscape, we believe the evaluation uniquely uncovers the platform's conductivity to the spread of misinformation.
翻译:本文从两个看似正统的角度评估Parler这个有争议的社交媒体平台:UX设计视角和数据科学。 UX设计研究人员探索用户如何对其社交媒体反馈的界面/内容作出反应; 数据科学研究者分析这些反馈中的错误信息流,以探测替代叙述和由国家赞助的虚假信息运动。 我们对这些方法的交叉点进行了批判性审视,以了解Parler的界面本身是如何对错误信息流和观众对“自由言论”的看法的传导作用。 Parler在2020年美国大选之前和之后,作为自由言论的“替代”场所,引起广泛的关注,作为对积极用内容警告标注错误信息的其他主流社会媒体平台的反应。 因为Parler这样的平台对社会媒体环境具有破坏作用,我们认为这次评估独有地揭示了该平台对错误信息传播的传导力。