Purpose: To create and evaluate the accuracy of an artificial intelligence Deep learning platform (ORAiCLE) capable of using only retinal fundus images to predict both an individuals overall 5 year cardiovascular risk (CVD) and the relative contribution of the component risk factors that comprise this risk. Methods: We used 165,907 retinal images from a database of 47,236 patient visits. Initially, each image was paired with biometric data age, ethnicity, sex, presence and duration of diabetes a HDL/LDL ratios as well as any CVD event wtihin 5 years of the retinal image acquisition. A risk score based on Framingham equations was calculated. The real CVD event rate was also determined for the individuals and overall population. Finally, ORAiCLE was trained using only age, ethnicity, sex plus retinal images. Results: Compared to Framingham-based score, ORAiCLE was up to 12% more accurate in prediciting cardiovascular event in he next 5-years, especially for the highest risk group of people. The reliability and accuracy of each of the restrictive models was suboptimal to ORAiCLE performance ,indicating that it was using data from both sets of data to derive its final results. Conclusion: Retinal photography is inexpensive and only minimal training is required to acquire them as fully automated, inexpensive camera systems are now widely available. As such, AI-based CVD risk algorithms such as ORAiCLE promise to make CV health screening more accurate, more afforadable and more accessible for all. Furthermore, ORAiCLE unique ability to assess the relative contribution of the components that comprise an individuals overall risk would inform treatment decisions based on the specific needs of an individual, thereby increasing the likelihood of positive health outcomes.
翻译:为了创建和评估人工智能深层学习平台(ORAiCLE)的准确性,该平台只能使用视网膜基金图像来预测个人总体5年心血管风险(CVD)和构成这一风险的构成风险因素的相对贡献。方法:我们使用了47 236个病人访问数据库中的165 907个视网膜图像。最初,每张图像都与生物鉴别数据年龄、种族、性别、糖尿病存在和糖尿病持续时间、HDL/LDL比率以及视网膜图像获取5年的任何CVD事件准确度。根据Framingham方程式计算了一个风险得分。真实的CVD事件率也针对个人和总体人群。最后,我们用年龄、种族、性别及视网图像来培训。结果:与基于Framingham的评分相比,ORALELE的出现率高达12 %, 特别是对于风险最高的人群群体而言。现在使用Framinghamhamime 的每部LEA事件评分数的可靠性和准确性A所有限制性模型的亚性能评估结果。结果,其最终的CALELEA是获取成本数据的亚值。