A common writing style for statistical results are the recommendations of the American Psychology Association, known as APA-style. However, in practice, writing styles vary as reports are not 100% following APA-style or parameters are not reported despite being mandatory. In addition, the statistics are not reported in isolation but in context of experimental conditions investigated and the general topic. We address these challenges by proposing a flexible pipeline STEREO based on active wrapper induction and unsupervised aspect extraction. We applied our pipeline to the over 100,000 documents in the CORD-19 dataset. It required only 0.25% of the corpus (about 500 documents) to learn statistics extraction rules that cover 95% of the sentences in CORD-19. The statistic extraction has nearly 100% precision on APA-conform and 95% precision on non-APA writing styles. In total, we were able to extract 113k reported statistics, of which only <1% is APA conform. We could extract in 46% the correct conditions from APA-conform reports (30% for non-APA). The best model for topic extraction achieves a precision of 75% on statistics reported in APA style (73% for non-APA conform). We conclude that STEREO is a good foundation for automatic statistic extraction and future developments for scientific paper analysis. Particularly the extraction of non-APA conform reports is important and allows applications such as giving feedback to authors about what is missing and could be changed.
翻译:统计结果的一种常见的写法风格是美国心理学协会(APA)的建议,即APA式的统计结果。然而,在实践中,写法风格不尽相同,因为根据APA式的报告不是100%,或者尽管强制性,但没有报告参数;此外,统计数据不是单独报告,而是在试验条件和一般主题范围内报告。我们通过在主动包装上岗和不受监督的提取的基础上提出灵活的STEREO管道,来应对这些挑战。我们用我们的管道对CORD-19数据集中的10万多份文件进行了处理。我们只需要0.25%的材料(大约500份文件)来学习涵盖CORD-19中95%的判决的统计提取规则。统计提取方法几乎有100%的准确性,而对于非APA格式的不精确性,95%的准确性。我们总共能够提取113k报告的统计数据,其中只有 <1%符合APA。我们可以在46%的APA-C格式报告(30 %用于非APA)中提取正确的条件。关于主题提取的最佳模型在CORD-19中实现了75 %的精确度,关于AA-AAA-SIRA格式的统计格式报告是提供良好提取基础的正确性分析,而我们为SIRA-SIRA格式的不进行这样的格式,而没有作出这样的分析。